(I began writing this while drinking a cold beer at a temple on top of a hill waiting for sunset. I'm finishing it on a 5-6 hour coach journey to Phnom Penh, in a slightly-too-small seat with two occasionally screaming children opposite me and the local equivalent of a Bollywood movie* on a TV screen and blasting out of the speakers... Well, they say Cambodia is a country of extremes.
* Collywood? Certainly puts me in mind of something that's going to stick around for a few hours without doing anything aesthetically pleasing.
Anyway, we've just spent four days in Siem Reap, the small town that exists mainly to service the many tourists who visit the Angkor temples. It's a great place to spend a few days because the temples are amazing. They date from the 8th century up - the most famous being from the 12th - and after a long period of abandonment they were rediscovered just over 100 years ago and gradually restored and opened up to visitors. They open before dawn and close after sunset and, with one annoying exception, you have a lot of freedom to clamber all over them and touch and photograph whatever you want, which is brilliant. I don't know how long this will last or if the exception is the sign of changes to come, but surely the more international organisations that get involved and the more visitors come, the more likely they are to get restrictive.
There's an interesting little visitor centre at one temple which tells that some of them (or some parts) were in such a parlous state - from the elements, from trees falling on them or rather spectacularly growing up through them, in some cases from early visitors and from the Khmer Rouge - that they were taken apart and rebuilt and restored piece by piece, using the original stones and, where possible, original techniques and materials.* So it's strange to wander round and see that some bits are obvious reconstructions but others appear to be genuinely beautifully well-preserved (I picked a photo from Banteay Srei, below, which has miraculously intricate detail and a missing head, which makes me assume it's original).
* One of the temples at Angkor Thom had just been deconstructed when the Khmer Rouge came to power, and the careful plans and notes they made were lost. They're still putting it back together now. I like to think that a generation brought up on Lego will be a bit better at this.
Anyway, once you get here, it's time to hire a tuk-tuk and driver for the day and off you go - there's a good number of temples in a small radius and a few slightly more distant ones.
There's probably a bit of a trick to scheduling, which you may be familiar with from Peter Jackson's
Lord of the Rings trilogy (bear with me, if you've made it this far). There are 4 indisputable stars, the must-sees - Angkor Wat, Bayon, Ta Prohm and Banteay Srei, which you could just about cram into a day. But if you see all those first, temple fatigue will set in, and places like Ta Preo and Preah Khan, which might have blown you away when expectations were lower, will be a bit of a let-down. Jackson knew this when he put what looked like the battle scene to end all battle scenes in
Fellowship, then topped it in
The Two Towers and topped that again in
Return of the King. If you saw
RotK first then its predecessors would have looked relatively tame. A bit of restraint early on can be a big help. A 3-day temple pass (you don't have to use it on consecutive days) gives time for a leisurely visit to all the main places of interest. We held back our main visit to Angkor Wat till the last day, but in retrospect maybe Bantei Srei and Ta Prohm or even Bayon would have been better calls.
Ambitiously, we kicked off with a 4:30a.m. alarm to make sunrise at Angkor Wat. Lilly was not happy at the time but even she agreed this was worth it. AW is a huge square site, sitting inside a fantastic wide moat. The thing to do here is arrive early in darkness, cross the moat, enter the outer wall, walk halfway to the main temple until you reach a big pond on either side of the path. Turn left and walk 2/3 of the way along the pond-side and when the sun rises, it is just about over the temple, and you get a stunning reflection in the pond. (Apparently in the ideal spot you can see all 5 towers on both temple and reflection, so I was pretty close.) It's lovely. Even I could manage a few decent photos.
(Our directions were less specific so we didn't get here in time to be front row - it's fairly busy - but could still peek through.)
I guess we could have gone back to the hotel for a nap and/or breakfast but we boldly pressed on, leaving a proper look at AW for another day. It's pretty good out until 830 or so, very quiet and pleasantly warm rather than hot, so a good time to visit our #1 favourite - Bayon, in the Angkor Thom complex.
If you've seen a picture of Angkor it will be either the temple at AW or the giant faces at Bayon.
Hundreds of giant faces, and the more you look, the more you see (the degree of preservation varies). We popped back later in the day for a second look as the rest of Angkor Thom is not as good (though it's worth seeing the Terrace of the Elephants from a few angles, some great bas reliefs and sculptures).
After lunch we went to Ta Prohm, which is a bit more derelict and overrun by trees - you can imagine Indiana Jones here, or Lara Croft (part of one of the Tomb Raider movies was shot in Angkor, but I've managed to wipe them from my mind so I can't tell you which or where). Really enjoyable, with some brilliant trees working their way through and over the walls.
We just had time to stop off at Ta Keo - a tall and steep pyramid vaguely Inca-style - before heading to one of the two main sunset sites, Phnom Bakheng, a forgettable temple on top of a hill. We messed this up, I think. The point is not to see the sun set, but to see the colour of the sky 10 minutes later. (There's nothing to really set it against so you're just using the elevation.) We watched the sun set, saw quite a few people leaving, and decided to beat the rush down. We should probably have stayed. The down-side would have been descending in the dark - some incredibly steep stone steps followed by 10 minutes on the path. Pack a torch!
On Day 2, we stopped off at a fairly missable pyramid structure (Ta Keo, I think) - first sign of temple fatigue - at the start of a 37km trip to Banteay Srei. This takes a bit of time in a tuk-tuk but it's well worth it for a very different type of temple, quite small but with beautiful, intrictate decorations and very well preserved. Don't miss this.
On the other hand, I kind of wish we had missed extending our trip to visit Kbal Spean (it's another 9km and drivers will want a supplement). This is basically a 1500m uphill hike - heavy going in places over rocks - to the barely visible remains of a temple and a pleasant enough waterfall. Now, at every single other temple, each arriving tuk-tuk is greeted by kids or women trying to sell you cold drinks. Here, we just got a couple of kids with postcards, and the drink stalls 20 yards away ignored us. There's a massive gap in the market for someone to run up and say "This is a 3km round trip, it's hot and this is your last chance to buy water." I really wish someone had told me this and tried a hard sell for the one time I really needed to buy something. (I tried to explain this to one of the postcard kids when we got back down but I'm not sure 6-year-olds here have enough of a background in micro-economic principles for it to work, which is itself a gap in another market but probably not one that is likely to be filled. To be fair too myself, I didn't try to explain this bit to the postcard kids.)
So, a very late lunch by the lovely lake at Sras Srang (above - the driver's recommendation, a good and cheap local place) and a quick look at Banteay Kdey temple (falling down in various semi-interesting ways but a bit sub-Ta Prohm), and on to Preah Khan, which falls somewhere between those two. It's quite big, and worth making it to the far end for a great tree that looks a bit like am alien pod that has landed and sprouted up, curling around the buildings. Which is quite accurate, I guess.
We took Day 3 off for a bit of R&R and picked up Day 4 with the Roulos Group, slightly out of town and another victim of temple fatigue. We'd saved up the afternoon for our return to Angkor Wat - saved probably too much time, as it turns out. AW has a great bas relief running around the outside of the temple, which is well worth a good look. But I think the temple promises from a distance a bit more than it delivers up close. Most annoying is that the top section has been closed (a guidebook says it used to be open and there are fairly recent wooden steps for those who don't fancy the steep stone). The first real restriction on going anywhere comes right at the last minute!
[edit: months later, someone who had a tour guide around AW told us that you can just bribe the local police and they'll take you up there.]
Oh well. We stick around for sunset - this is another recommended spot but we can't work out exactly why or where. It's possible there are people round the back framing the temple against the sky but I don't think that would work... Best spot may be the main gate by the moat.
(Now this bus is playing a cheap and noisy Hong Kong action film - unreadable subtitles in English and presumably Khmer. Does anyone want to watch this?)
So, a very good trip. Everything is very easy for the tourist here - the town itself is completely Khmer-cialised. It even has a road called Pub Street, from the humble beginnings of its first pub ("Angkor What?") 11 years ago to a lot of bars and restaurants (almost all with free wifi if you don't want to walk 20 yards to the many internet cafes). You'll never go short of water or fruit at the temples, and at most of them you can buy T-shirts, postcards, guidebooks etc.
(Especially for Joe - you'll like the burgers at Le Tigre de Papier, Kamasutra does a good curry, and apart from that we mainly ate local-style food, which was decent to good - don't be tempted by the Cambodian Barbeque where you can cook your own chicken, beef, squid, snake and crocodile. You get what looks like an overturned metal collander, heated from below, with a big lump of fat at the top and a moat around the outside to cook your veg. On the rare occasions that we managed to get a piece of meat to cook in the thin sloping space below the fat without it falling into the water, it wasn't worth it! The balcony at the Red Piano is a nice spot in the evening. We also checked out the local apsara dancing show at Kou Len restaurant as recommended by our driver. Lilly quite liked it but dancing is not really for me. I've seen my sister do tap and ballet and I've seen the Bolshoi in Moscow. I'd like to think that this marks two extremes and if they didn't do anything for me, nothing in between is likely to. Get there early for the buffet if you do decide to try it!)
I am struck by the varying value of money though. Their own currency is barely used - USD is ubiquitous, with local 1000 riel notes standing in for quarters on the rare occasions you get change from a dollar (fixed exchange rate apparently), and Thai baht also widely accepted. This is one sign of the troubles this country has had. Siem Reap probably hides the rest, but there are so many people dependent on the tourist trade - a lot of them used to farm their land near the temples but are now prohibited.
The law isn't all it should be either - our driver was pulled up one day for forgetting to wear his driver's waistcoat, and even though his papers were in order we clearly saw him slip a couple of notes to the policeman to be allowed to leave. He was fairly subtle but could have done with watching Tom Selleck do it a little more closely. Shortly after we saw a policeman at a temple trying to sell police badges to tourists!
So what does one dollar buy you here?
- A can of coke at the temples
- An entire pineapple, nicely sliced up
- 80 minutes in an internet cafe
- 2 draft beers in happy hour on Pub Street (which is all day in some places) - the two local beers in Siem Reap are confusingly called Angkor and Anchor (they pronounce the latter with a soft ch, an-chaw).
- About an hour of a tuk-tuk driver's time ($15 from pre-dawn to 10pm)
- A third to a quarter of a tasty meal (eg some kind of stir fried chicken and rice)
- 1/40th of a 3 day temple pass
- A glossy guidebook, cover price $27, from the right seller (the ones at AW won't go below 4, but out at Banteay Srei the going rate seems cheaper), or a Lonely Planet for any number of places - I haven't seen many lorries out here but not many of them have backs, which may explain this
- Half a T-shirt
- A pair of underpants laundered in our hotel (or more accurately next door - we saw the racks of "laun'dry" drying in the sun)
- A book of 10 decent postcards from a kid, or a single postcard in some shops
- A quarter of a cocktail (eg the Tomb Raider at the Red Piano, which Lilly recommends)
Draw your own conclusions, but it all seems out of kilter to me and the tuk-tuk guys seem to get the worst of it - supply comfortably exceeds demand, as we found when we tried to get one home one evening and quickly attracted a crowd who went straight down to $2 when we'd been expecting more. Our driver was probably glad that Lilly hates getting up early!
So Siem Reap kept us entertained for a few days (I think tourist town fatigue would have set in if we'd stayed any longer) and the Angkor temples really are great. It's a nice, relaxing place to be, out in the countryside - in places it feels very English, with English-looking trees, until you realise that it's a hot, sunny day and yet there are some autumn leaves on the ground. Other parts feel more exotic. It's hot in the sun, but not humid, and the breeze in the tuk-tuk is refreshing. I'd heard that it can get very busy, and we're in peak season, but it was never too bad anywhere (apart from maybe getting down the mountain at dusk). I feel refreshed and ready to deal with a couple of cities, so it's off for probably a couple of nights in Phnom Penh and then Vietnam, starting with Ho Chi Minh City.
After an entry this ridiculously long, I feel the need for a sign-off. Hmm... a twist on an old favourite...
Yours in travel,
Paul